The rescale wasn't gonna add it in either as the team had to focus on map dlc's. World wide it might not be as popular as San Fran but I can promise you the people in that area know it exist, lol. I suppose when California was first made, 1:35 just didn't have the space to have San Jose. So the occlusion of it was odd.but not really. Iirc, it was like #7 or 8th largest in the US. They do occur in real life and a game loaded with only trucks + trailer just isn't immersive at all.īefore covid, San Jose was actually much higher in population. Please make the return of the bobtail for immersion purposes. I'm assuming the bobtail in the screenshot is the player. Since Oakland is showing this lane, what's the point of adding it if bobtail AI's are not in the game. They brought back the moon.why not bobtails?īobtails don't have to spawn in high numbers either but make them as frequent as the old school F-100 pickup. Some put bikes on the back of their cabs. When some drivers make drops, sometimes they unhook their trailers to ride around town if need be. We shouldn't need a mod to begin with for bobtails.Īround ports, bobtails are definitely common. I had to redo the mod every time SCS did an update for trucks as it broke the mod each time so I just stopped. We shouldn't have to make a mod for this. Its missing in the game as much as more truck variety itself was back in the day. Hopefully can convince them to bring back bobtails in AI traffic. Truckers simply don't always have trailers attached. Something that isn't even realistic is in ATS but something like bobtails that is realistic was removed? Make it make sense. Retarders aren't here either but they added that back in. When are bobtails coming back to ATS SCS? I hate that SCS listened to a few complainers and removed something that is 100% realistic in North America. Zero chance I'm letting this slide without saying anything, lol. I was definitely saying something about this. If only that meant bobtailing AI were to return to the game(s). I can't stress enough how vital this could be for ATS farming. When the same 3-4 farms are used in order states, there should be a table/pull down menu from a massive library that tells each farm what they can produce. I don't think SCS will give us 5-10 new farm companies in ATS. We need multiple new produce, fruit and nut farms or make these farms dynamic so that they can produce multiple cargos all deriving from the same prefab. Soooo yesss Chico can add more potential to California for sure. With 5 different types of farms each should be kicking out several different cargos. Add it for California and other states can feed off that. Why not have dynamic farms staring with California. ETS2 breaks up fruits, vegetables and meat but ATS doesn't. Where is poultry and hog live stock? We are in the GP were poultry and hogs are but nothing so far. For example: If we have 25 farms in California as a whole and if we have 1)produce farms, 2)dairy farms, 3)orchids, 4)live stock and 5)nut farms.we can't have just 1 cargo coming from 5 totally different types of farms. Static farms simply doesn't work for ATS and I wish SCS changes this sooner than later. We just need farms in the game that are dynamic. California grows a ton of different things and the more farms we have in California, the more immersive it would be. CA-32 has a ton of wiggle room to get back to CA-44. Chico can sit just off in that large space that's there. Just continue South Ave past the truck stops that we already have and head to CA-99. There seems to be space and the road is already there to get to Chico. So yesssss, I'm going to keep bringing Chico up. I don't see a reason why Chico can't come.I'll put it that way. I say I expect Chico but I'm really saying I hope Chico comes. We simply just don't have an Agricultural presence North of I-80 in Northern California. Hopefully a mid level or senior mapper can become free and add Chico. It might not be until phase 1 Nevada perhaps. Southern California will be time consuming enough. I wouldn't expect it until there is capacity to do so. Now I can't say I expect Chico for phase 4 though. Either he read himself, or a colleague mentioned it to him. Davido fortunately listened to feedback on a few occasions with his projects. It just takes the right person at SCS to make that difference. If more people see the benefits to it, we can all make change just like everyone helped me voice opinion with Cody.and look what happened. I have zero idea but I won't drop the topic until its in, lol. Could it maybe come Phase 4 like how we got Lake Tahoe phase 3? What is the chance we actually get Chico? I would like to see it too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |